USTLG Winter Meeting 2
Posted by selinalock on 8 December, 2010
This follow on with my report of the USTLG Winter Meeting.
Finding the known unknowns and the unknown knowns, Yvonne Nobis, University of Cambridge.
- Talked about their development of the http://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/scienceportal/website aimed specifically at researchers (which I know some of our researchers rather like the look of!)
- Researchers often don’t known what they’re looking for: unknown unknowns, as research skills might need updating, looking for something outside their field or don’t know where to begin.
- Scientists don’t tend to use the Cambridge libraries (over 100 of them so confusing system) and they want everything electronically so looking for a way to meet their needs.
- Found most visitors to the science library are those looking for historical (print) information, or students wanting a place to study.
- ~95% journal are online and ~95% of monographs are still print only.
- In response to this they will now scan on demand from their own collections for Cambridge researchers (currently a free service as charging would have copyright law implications).
- As the staff would often need to retrieve these items from storage the scanning has not added too much extra effort.
- Science librarians at Cambridge do a lot of training of early career researchers.
- Science@Cambridge contextualises information within a subject area to help researchers start their searching.
- Includes a federated search option where relevant databases have been chosen (to steer researchers away from just using Google Scholar as they don’t realise what scholar doesn’t index: unknown unknowns).
- Trying to make resource discovery as easy as possible.
- Have problems with making eBooks easy to access, especially individual titles on catalogue records.
- Trialled using chat with subject librarians but not really worked so looking at centralising enquiries more.
- Training branded through College or Computing Services gets a better turn out than library branded training.
We use a similar idea to Science@Cambridge in our subject rooms, but could learn more from them when redeveloping our Rooms as part of our digital library overhaul? Hopefully using Summon in future will make resource discovery easier at Leicester
Obviously the most important part of any conference is the lunch provided. This time it was a good spread sponsored by Wiley Publishers, and in a very unexpected place…
Citations Count! Experience of providing researcher training on bibliometrics, citations and Open Access publishing. Kate Bradbury, Cardiff University.
- Training in citation data in response to REF raising interest in bibliometrics, funders requesting bibliometric data, help deciding where to publish and to promote work.
- Training covers: WoS/Scopus/Google Scholar, looking for data in other sources (e.g. book citations, full text resources which include references), what each database provides e.g. impact factors, increasing citations, using open access publishing and repositories.
- Format of training: 30 min talk and 1 hr hands-on using workbooks – activities such as finding impact factors, setting up citation alerts, looking at OA resource and using ResearcherID.
- Also do shorter, tailored talks for Departmental meetings etc.
- Sessions dones for subject librarians, staff development programme, specific schools/depts (e.g. Comp Sci, Engin, Psychology) and within seminar series.
- Lessons learnt: avoid too much detail, stay up to date with new database features and REF, emphasis benefits to researchers, takes time to build interest in training, targeted sessions best, be flexible & adapt sessions to suit audience, be prepared for discussions about the validity and use of bibliometrics!
- Stance taken: explain how to find information but leave it up to the researchers to decide if it is useful to them, including discussion of pros/cons of bibliometrics.
- Types of questions asked:
- How to pay for OA publishing?
- Shouldn’t we just write controversial articles to up our citations?
- What about highly cited, poor research?
- My journals not indexed in WoS, how do I get citation info?
- How to find book citation info?
- What about self-citations? Will they be excluded from REF?
- BMJ article said no observable citation advantage from OA publishing…
- Can I import articles on in WoS into ResearcherID? (can do, but tricky)
- What is a good H-Index to have?
- Doesn’t H-Index just reflect length of career?
- Where’s the best place to put an OA article?
- I use a subject repository so why also use institutional repository?
- I don’t want an early version of my work available…
- What next in terms of training? – Continue with sessions, support subject librarians to run their own sessions, introduce Bristol Online Survey to collect feedback from attendees, respond to individual follow-up questions and do a separate presentation on OA publishing.
Wiley Publishers: WIREs, Alexa Dugan.
Next up was our sponsor for the day Wiley talking about their new product:
- WIREs = Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews.
- Reference work meets journal review article – a new concept in publishing.
- Have been finding it difficult to find authors/researchers with enough time to devote to writing traditional reference works, especially as those works do not gain professional recognition .i.e. they are not indexed or cited.
- WIREs is Wiley’s answer to this: invited content with high quality editorship, drawing on their research journal community ties (so like a reference work), but also managed to get them indexed in major databases and WoS so the authors can get recognition.
- Each Review has a carefully thought out structure, which is kept up to date with a range of article types e.g. focus (news) articles, opinion pieces, basic reviews, advanced reviews etc.
- Content is added every two months (so serial like a journal) & articles retain their title and DOIs for citation purposes.
- One of their flagship titles: Climate Change Review has won several awards already.
- FREE for first two years: wires.wiley.com
Researcher@Library – becoming part of the research cycle, Katy Sidwell, University of Leeds.
- Leeds, like many of us, have managed to get a certain amount of library training embedded or offered to PhD students, but what about Academics and other Researchers?
- Started to think about how to support researchers so thought about the life cycle of a research project:
- Ides (pre-funding) – Planning (finding application) – Action (research/life of grant) – Dissemination – Application (of research knowledge/transfer) – back to beginning of cycle.
- They got us to think about how we all support these stages of the cycle & feedback (using post it notes – a good bit of interactivity to wake us all up!).
- What they (and from the feedback, others might do) are:
- Ideas = library collections, current awareness & literature search training.
- Planning = Identify funding sources ^ support research bids (though in Leeds this only happens in particular areas as it’s labour intensive and unscaleable).
- Action = PhD workshops, bibliographic management, lit search support, data management advice, user behaviour research, friendly space for researchers.
- Dissemination = RAE/REF support, etheses online, institutional repository, publications database.
- Application = intellectual property advice (Business officer), market research for knowledge transfer e.g. patents.
- Hard for researchers to know about training – where/how to promote?
- Created a website for researchers to bring together the various things available to them (need user needs analysis to find out what to put there).
- Researchers wanted a website that was not solely library resources/focused, not tutorial but advice that could be dipped into at appropriate time, simple navigation, no login but not really basic advice – appropriate to their level.
- Work in progress – need to clarify purpose, look at navigation issues, obtain feedback and roll out across other faculties.
- Where now? – created Library Researcher Support Group to continue the work and look at how it fits in with the new Vitae researcher development framework.
A good day all round. The presentations from the day can now be viewed at the USTLG site.