Posted by gazjjohnson on 9 May, 2011
Following a conversation with a fellow repository manager on Friday about countries using our research, I did a bit of quick and dirty analysis on the LRA, taking a data range of 1/4/2009-30/4/2011. Here’s the top 20 countries using us, and the percentage of the overall accesses they make up.
- United Kingdom (39.72%)
- United States (12.84%)
- India (3.13%)
- Germany (2.64%)
- Australia (2.41%)
- Canada (2.35%)
- China (2.23%)
- Italy (1.51%)
- France (1.48%)
- Malaysia (1.44%)
- Netherlands (1.29%)
- Japan (1.06%)
- Iran (1.05%)
- Spain (1.04%)
- Greece (0.94%)
- Turkey (0.89%)
- Hong Kong (0.82)%
- Ireland (0.82%)
- Indonesia (0.77%)
- Taiwan (0.75%)
- The top 10 make up 69.7% of all accesses to the LRA mounted research over that time.
- The top 20 make up 79.2% of all accesses to the LRA mounted research over that time.
I don’t know whether to be delighted or distressed that the bulk of accesses come from the UK. It’s good that the research is getting read here, but so much depends these days on overseas researchers making use of the research we publish. Other repository managers reading this – how does this compare to your own repositories? Similar? Completely different?
And for any Leicester folk reading this – are these the countries that we’d expect to be using our research? Of course, we are always limited by the materials that academics send us, and I’m well aware there are many, many gaps in our collections that I’d be only too keen to fill!
Posted in Leicester Research Archive | Tagged: 2009, 2010, 2011, access, countries, downloads, lra, over time, statistics | 1 Comment »
Posted by gazjjohnson on 11 November, 2010
I’ve oft quoted that since our repository began that at least 5 accesses have been with the Nintendo Wii. I had a meeting this afternoon to talk open access and educational resources with the delightful Terese Bird of the BDRA (on Project SPIDER business), and the topic came up. She posed the question about m-devices, and how often they were accessing the LRA’s resources. Gotta confess I had no idea, but I went away to find out. The results are below (for the last year since 11/10/2009 to date)
O/s of people accessing the LRA (Nov 09-Nov 10)
- Windows 90.57%
- Macintosh 7.15%
- Linux 1.57%
- iPhone 0.26%
- (not set) 0.16%
- iPad 0.09%
- iPod 0.06%
- Android 0.04%
- SymbianOS 0.03%
- BlackBerry 0.02%
Well colour me not very surprised that the vast amount of accesses are via Windows PCs (although I’d be interested to know how that Windows/Apple split matches up against supposed market shares in academia!). M-devices are, as I expected, fairly low (around 0.5% in total).
O/s of people accessing the LRA (Nov 08-Nov 09)
- Windows 91.61%
- Macintosh 6.69%
- Linux 1.29%
- (not set) 0.23%
- iPhone 0.09%
- iPod 0.04%
- SunOS 0.02%
- SymbianOS 0.01%
- BlackBerry 0.01%
- Android > 0.00%
Now when you compare it with 2008-9 figures over the same period you get ~0.15%, so the latest figure is a tripling of access by mobile devices in a single year. What do I expect to see by this time in 2011? Well getting on for around 2% – or a much more dramatic rise? I suspect the latter as iPads and the like make their way out into the market more. Which means in terms of developing our repository, the use of m-devices needs to be a consideration – not an overwhelming one yet, but certainly one that we take very seriously.
Posted in Leicester Research Archive | Tagged: access, information, m-devices, mobile devices, mobiles, repository, roaming, stats | Leave a Comment »
Posted by gazjjohnson on 2 December, 2009
Thanks to the RSP for developing this handy poster promoting open access and depositing in your repository
Click on it to see it full sized. Has any one thought of a good way to use it? I’m a bit short of walls myself.
Posted in Open Access | Tagged: access, open, poster, promotion, repository | Leave a Comment »
Posted by gazjjohnson on 16 November, 2009
What are the three best articles on open access?
Not the ones that I might like but the key ones that I should/could/might get my academics to read.
Not necessarily ones that will have them convinced or arch-evangalising left right and centre, but ones that really give a rich overview of the topic. Ones that even bring some academic rigour to the discipline, some facts and figures as much as hearts and minds. Ones, like the THE, that take a look at all the stakeholders and try to offer a dispassionate overview (or as dispassionate as it is possible to get!).
They don’t have to be peer reviewed, they can be reports, they can be briefings, they can be conference papers – they just have to be accessible and credible.
And here’s the trick – they have to be available, in full-text in an open access repository! Suggestions welcomed and indeed warmly invited – but no more than three per commenter!!!
Posted in Open Access | Tagged: academics, access, articles, best, open, research, scholarly communication | 3 Comments »