Today we’re hosting repository managers from across the UK, and I’m going to attempt to keep up with the key points of the event here as the day goes on.
10.30: Jen Delasalle (Warwick) and Louise Jones (Leicester) opening the event.
10.40: Jen is standing down as UKCoRR Chair, oh no. Wonder if I should run? Or maybe I should let someone else go for it.
10.42: RCUK looking to set up a central system to record their research outputs. So does this mean we need a CRIS as well or is this taking over from local recording of research?
10.45: Discussing remit of group and membership criteria, and the elephant in the room of funding the longer term development of UKCoRR. Should we pass the hat round each meeting? Always tricky – once you have funding you are beholden to your funders, be they members or institutional and can be called to account. Would this change the organisation too much?
10.50: Looking more at the RCUK outputs and capture, and the role of the repository.
10.55: Journal TOCs project – an API drawing on 13,000 journal outputs. Nick Shephard (aka @MrNick on twitter) will be talking about a project related to this later on this morning. Idea is to allow searching for publications for local authors, which is useful – but you need to build a tool to exploit the API, we’d ned someone else to build us the tool. Perhaps this is what Mr Nick will be going to do for us all?
10.58: Role of publishers and repository managers working together with authors. And the idea of publishers selling us metadata – erm, no thanks.
11.00 Nicky Cashman (Aber) now talking about her work at CADIR and Aberystwyth. Her main role is advocacy around the university. Noted that UKCoRR now has 182 members, impressive – when’s our three day conference in Hastings then? She’s gone on to give us an idea of how much stuff they now have in their repository. first mention for Webometrics – which is interesting as Nicky and I were discussing this last night; how much do we really trust their data – even if senior management love it when we rise up the tables.
11.15: Talking about Bartrum and the Seals in Medieval Wales (SiMeW) project. Interesting that Aber and CADIR are more embedded within their departments – is this due to the size of the institution being smaller than Leicester? I’ve heard this comment from other unis with smaller academic numbers that it has been easier for them to work together with their academics directly.
11.20: Talking Ethos and mandates for theses. Something I’ll be talking about here at Leicester later on this morning. Currently the’re an opt in institution for thesis deposits, so I can understand the difficulties they must face. They are a first requester pays organisation for theses, which I think is going to an increasingly popular choice for institutions, and increasingly unpopular choice for readers.
11.25: Aber is doing a survey on ethesis deposit mandates, comment from Southampton that they (like Leicester) are an opt-out mandate institution.
11.30: Breaking for tea. After this Nick Shepard and then me are on. Not quite sure I can present and blog at the same time so might have to fill that bit in post-hoc.
11.55: Nick and Wendy Luker from Leeds Met talking about the Bibliosight Project (querying Web of Science from the desktop). JISC RI project . Uses Thomson Reuter’s Web of Science Web Services (WSLite/WoSAPI) – sadly live demo hasn’t worked out for today, but thankfully Nick has a back up to show us. Idea is to down load and autopopulate the repository with data from the WoS. They aim to use it to promote deposit from and tie this into the REF.
12.10: Distracted by sorting out network keys, so will have to look at Nick’s presentation later. However, he’s now giving us a screen capture demo of how the queries work, which I assume we’ll be able to view later as well. Plan is to take the data out (as XML) and convert using SWORD into repository ingest.
12.13: Readiness for REF, looking at the wider issue of data capture (R4R), from) Les Carr of Southampton. Questions about how this works into the workflows of the repository e.g. with so many records downloaded how do you get them in, authenticated and cleanly.
12.15: Some questions still outstanding – see Nick’s presentation.
12.20: Off to do my talk….
12.55: And I’m done. Got some laughs in the right place, which was good. Interesting comment from Gill Hall (Herts) that I could have just as easily have been telling her story as a repository manager. That’s the good thing from UKCoRR, it really is the best community to belong to (well along with FIL) – everyone seems to share the same sort of problems and issues.
12.57: Dominic Tate is now up talking about the RSP, and their new series of events. Sounds promising I hope I can get to some of those, as they’re good networking and training days. There will be an event based on the forthcoming economics of open access report written by Alma Swann (June 17th probably). Aimed at senior university management, rather than repository workers.
13.03: Talking about his work representing UKCoRR as well. Including the JISC Persistent Identifier Working Group.
13.05: Important for repository mangers to work more closely with their research staff.
14.14: Post lunch and after a whistle-stop tour around the multi-awarding David Wilson Library, Hannah Payne from the Welsh Repository Network talked about their work. They are launching two new objects on metadata use in repositories. Also comments about non-standard collections (e.g. ceramics) and how to get them into repository, like UWIC has. National Library of Wales looking to expand role in terms of collecting and storing digital items like theses, but question about how that relates to Ethos.
14.25: Integrating repositories with the REF and satisfying their requirements is something they still looking at; not a big surprise. WRN is planning a repository and CRIS event, which will be held at Leeds Met University and will be open to all.
14.30: Question about a cross searching tool, stemming from WRN Google custom search tool.
14.31: Jane Smith now on talking Advanced SHERPA/RoMEO. Demonstrating the new features of the search tool and the new output, that allows you to add in funder name. Also records now no longer list all the funders automatically, can opt for none, 1 or all. Remember DOAJ open access journals don’t all support archiving in a repository, and as these are now listed on RoMEO important to go and check their actually policies.
14.37: Jane now showing all publisher lists and the information you can garner from them. It is now possible to even generate list of payments needed to make items open access. S/RoMEO’s monthly updates are displayed on a regular webpage.
14.47: Peter Millington from SHERPA is now speaking about the RoMEO API. Journals may appear in one or more data sources (Zetoc, DOAJ and the RoMEO journals database). Different sources may list different publishers, and this can be a problem to identify which is the right one to use. Who is the publisher, and who counts for copyright and whose’s policy takes priority? There are some clear cut cases, but where two publishers appear to have the rights, then they may not be compatible.
14.55: Difference between current RoMEO and trial RoMEO being illustrated, I think right now though this looks like muddying the water until things roll out for use.
15.06: Moving onto coffee and copyright.
16.54: Finally back at my desk after cleaning up the room and sorting out the leftovers. The copyright session was good, but I think we really needed a couple of hours to dig into some of the issues. But useful all the same. And with that UKCoRR is over again, which is a shame – I could have done with two more days to really get round and talk to all the people I needed to, and indeed wanted to. Sorry if you were one of the ones I had to rush by today – I really would have loved to have time to talk to you all – but it’s been a hectic day. More like this UKCoRR please.
Thanks to the committee and everyone involved in running today’s event – it was highly stimulating! A twitter stream of comments on the day can be found here.